Home / Nation / Sujatha Singh’s removal: War of words between Congress and BJP

Sujatha Singh’s removal: War of words between Congress and BJP

New Delhi(PTI): A political war of words erupted on Thursday over the sudden removal of Sujatha Singh as Foreign Secretary, with Congress asking Prime Minister Narendra Modi to explain the “summary” decision while BJP defended it as the right of the government.

The sacking of Sujatha Singh from the post of Foreign Secretary has come under criticism from Congress.
File Photo dna Research & Archives
External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj on Thursday said she had personally communicated to Sujatha Singh the government’s decision to appoint S Jaishankar as the new Foreign Secretary.

Swaraj’s comment came in the backdrop of reports that she was not in the loop over government’s decision to abruptly “curtail” Singh’s tenure nearly seven months before it was to end.

Jaishankar, Ambassador to the US, was appointed last night as the new Foreign Secretary in a surprise decision by the Union Cabinet’s Appointment Committee, which is headed by the Prime Minister. The 1977-batch IFS officer who had only two days to go for his retirement will have a two-year tenure as per the rules. The sacking of Singh has come under criticism from Congress.

National Conference leader and former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, meanwhile, welcomed the appointment of S Jaishankar as Foreign Secretary, calling it an “excellent” decision. The sudden and summary removal of the seniormost woman foreign service official by Modi government raises serious questions on its intent and administrative mechanism it is following,” Congress spokesman Randeep Surjewala said.
He noted that the development has come on the heels of similar summary terminations of SPG chief, DRDO chief and IIM Director.

“It puts a serious question mark on the administrative consistency and efficacy of actions of the Prime Minister,” Surjewala said, Contending that the action was “without reason”, he said the Prime Minister and External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj owe an explanation to the nation. He said the development was more serious as it had come after “supposedly successful” visit of US President Barack Obama here. Surjewala’s party colleague and former Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari sought to link the action to the episode involving an IFS officer who was jailed in the US two years back for allegedly mistreating her maid.

He tweeted: “Is sacking of Foreign Secretary late retribution for her stand on Devyani Khobragade affair? Removal after a Presidential visit ‘coincidental’? Government last night decided to replace Singh curtailing her tenure due to end in August and appointed Jaishankar, Ambassador to the US, in her place. Defending the decision, BJP spokesman Nalin Kohli said the government had acted well within its right to decide on appointment of officers and denied any political motive. He said it was not an unprecedented action as Congress governments have also done the similar things.

Hitting back at Congress, Kohli said the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had sacked the then Foreign Secretary A P Venkateswaran publicly at a press conference in 1987. “I don’t see any reason for a hue and cry. A government is within its rights to decide how it would like to appoint which officers and with what responsibilities. And this is not the first time….. Preceding governments have taken (such) decisions,” the BJP leader said.

“When we talk about precedents, such decisions have not been confined to the foreign service. It is an executive decision after all,” he said, adding “I do not see any reason that anyone can attribute any political motives. This is the right of the government.”

Taking on the Congress for raising questions on the decision, he said, “The Congress party spokesperson can try to do politics or anything. In any case it does not appear that they are inspired by their leadership. That’s why their constant method seems to be trying to raise a hue and cry on issues also where there is no scope to do so.” Asserting that there can’t be a political motive to everything, he said, “How can you mix it with the appointment of the Foreign Secretary? A government is within its right to appoint any officer and this has been done by preceding governments too.”