- Facebook’s cryptocurrency chief David Marcus testified before a Senate committee on Tuesday.
- Skeptical senators wanted to know why they should trust Facebook to build a digital currency, given its track record of scandals.
- Marcus argued in part that if an American company doesn’t do this, a foreign one will instead.
- The question of antitrust also came up.
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
Facebook’s David Marcus faced a bipartisan grilling for more than two hours in the US Senate on Tuesday as lawmakers tore into the company’s plans to launch a digital currency. The key theme throughout the hearing: Why should anyone trust Facebook to build this?
Marcus, who heads up Facebook’s cryptocurrency efforts, testified before the United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs about the California technology giant’s blockchain efforts, called Libra. The Libra currency was first announced in June and is currently scheduled to launch properly at some point in 2020.
Facebook has weathered sustained criticism from politicians on both sides of the aisle over its two years of scandals, and the Senate Committee hearing was no different, providing an opportunity for both Republicans and Democrats to bash the technology executive about both Libra and Facebook’s litany of other missteps.
Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown (Democrat) was incredibly critical of Facebook’s track record and its ability to competently play a role in the global financial system, quipping: “Like a toddler whose gotten its hands on a book of matches, Facebook has burned the house down over and over and called every arson a learning experience.”
Democrat Chris Van Hollen likened the Libra Association, the nominally independent organization that will oversee Libra, to “Spectre” — the villainous organisation from James Bond.
Throughout, Facebook’s Marcus remained essentially unflustered and stuck closely to PR talking points. Only one moment really ruffled him — when Republican John Kennedy went off on a tangent and asked whether “truthful reporting [on Facebook] has been displaced by flagrant displays of bullshit?”
After a pause, Marcus answered: “I don’t know how to answer that question,” to audible laughter from others in the room.
The big question: Trust
Marcus was asked repeatedly, by multiple senators, why Facebook could be trusted to create Libra — given its track record of missteps, from Cambridge Analytica to facilitating the spread of hate speech that fueled genocide in Myanmar.
The former PayPal president’s basic response had two parts: First, Facebook won’t be responsible overall for Libra — that control will be ceded to the Libra Association, of which Facebook will only be one member among a planned 100.
And second, Facebook is promising that Libra won’t be launched at all until it has satisfied all the relevant regulators’ concerns.
“Trust is primordial, and we’ve made mistakes in the past,” Marcus said. “We’re continuing to work really hard to get better … we’ve invested in a number of programs to get better.”
A nationalistic line of argument
In stressing the alleged need for Libra, Marcus also repeatedly leaned on an argument that plays into concerns about American geopolitical power: If an America company doesn’t build this, someone else might, to the detriment of the US.
“If we don’t lead in the space others will,” Marcus said in response to questions from Republican Tom Cotton. “The same way we will end up having tow internets and two infrastructures, we will have two different financial systems … I believe if we stay put we’re going to be in a situation in 10, 15 years where half the world is on a blockchain technology that is out of reach of our national security apparatus.”
However, the Libra Association is to be headquartered in Switzerland — though Marcus said that decision was not intended to “evade any responsibility” on regulations. “It is really because we believe a global, digitally native currency that will be used by people all round thr world would benefit from being headquarted in an international place … [that is the] home of many international organisations.”
Facebook, like other big tech companies, is facing increasing calls for antitrust action to be taken against it, and it was a theme that came up during Tuesday’s hearing.
Democrat Brian Schatz said that he had heard privately that some of the members of the Libra Association still had questions about how it would operate, and they signed on because they were “terrified to be left out because of Facebook’s market power.”
In response to questioning, Marcus stressed that Libra will be interoperable, meaning that users of one type of wallet software will be able to send money to ones using another. But, he conceded, Facebook will not integrate third-party wallet software into its own apps, just Calibra — giving it an immediate massive boost in audience to the company’s 2.7 billion users across the globe.
SEE ALSO: We just got a clear sign that Facebook’s dodgy reputation means it has a massive struggle to persuade people to use its new cryptocurrency Libra
Join the conversation about this story »
NOW WATCH: Why Apple’s Mac Pro ‘trash can’ was a colossal failure