New Delhi(Indilens News Team): Ramzan observed as a fasting period by Muslims it culminates in…
New Delhi(PTI): Amid row over conversions, Vice President Hamid Ansari on Monday said the freedom to change one’s religion or belief is a fundamental right and asserted that no religion should be given an official status.
Lauding the Indian approach of secularism “which does not erect a wall of separation of religion and state but proposes a ‘principled distance’ between them”, he said there is also a gap between commitment and practice in the approach.
“It (Indian secularism) does not, must not, give official status to any religion or accept its hegemonic position. Instead, ‘it is an ethically sensitive negotiated settlement between diverse groups and divergent values’. It is in consonance with Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 which stipulates that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance,” Ansari said.
He was addressing the ‘Annual International Studies Convention’ on the theme ‘Some Thoughts on the Sacred and Secular in International Relations’. His comments assume significance as these come amid a row over religious conversions.
Ansari said secularism in some Western countries, which is premised on homogenous, single-religion, are facing challenges from emigrant communities of other faiths, which is resulting into a “new multi-religiosity” that is threatening to “throw western secularism into turmoil”.
He opined that in these circumstances, the Indian approach of securlarism could be an alternate model, which does not create a barrier of separation of religion and state, but proposes a ‘principled distance’ between them.
Ansari said since the Indian context of secularism took shape in a multi-religious society, it also addresses the issues of intra-religious oppression and inter-religious domination.
“Different societies have developed their own versions of it in theory and practice. Some of these in the Western world premised on homogenous, single-religion, citizen bodies are today facing challenges from emigrant communities of other faiths; as a result, this new multi-religiosity is threatening to throw western secularism into turmoil. It is here that the distinctive feature of the Indian approach to secularism needs to be explored for an alternate model. It does not, as Rajeev Bhargava (JNU scholar) has pointed out, erect a strict wall of separation between religion and state but, instead, proposes a principled distance between them,” Ansari said.