The procedure has been performed successfully, it added
Chennai(PTI): AIADMK party general secretary P Muralidhar Rao clarified on Saturday that the meeting between Arun Jaitley and Jayalalithaa did not mean an alliance between the BJP and AIADMK. Insisting that BJP wanted to emerge as an “alternative” force in Tamil Nadu, he said that the two parties are not coming together.
“There was no link between Jaitley meeting Jayalalithaa and the possibility of the two parties coming together. BJP wanted to emerge as an alternative force in Tamil Nadu,” he told reporters, days after the high profile meeting was condemned by opposition parties led by DMK which questioned its propriety, citing the pendency of the AIADMK chief’s appeal in Karnataka High Court against her conviction in a corruption case.
“As a minister, Jaitley could have met the former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister for so many reasons, including to get her party’s support in the Lok Sabha to get bills passed. That does not mean the two parties are moving closer,” he said.
This is the first elaborate clarification by a national level BJP leader after a controversy erupted over the January 18 meeting of Jaitley.
Last week, BJP state unit President Tamilisai Soundararajan had said the meeting was only to seek AIADMK’s support for passage of crucial bills in Rajya Sabha, where NDA is in a minority.
Replying to a question on Ghar Wapsi programme by a Hindu outfit in Chennai yesterday, in which nine Christians were reconverted to Hindu religion, Rao put the onus on the state government to prevent forcible conversions, if any He said the party is against the practice.
“If any other organisation like VHP is involved in conversion, it is a law and order problem and the state should take action. Anyway nobody can do anything about voluntarily converting to other religion,” he said.
“The issue of conversion should be looked in the spirit that if there is conversion… there would be reconversion.” Rao said the fact that the state government had not registered any case proved there was no such thing as forcible conversion.