Srinagar: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday headed to disputed Kashmir to rally support for…
New Delhi,Tavleen Singh(IE): Next week’s elections in Maharashtra and Haryana have turned into a referendum on Narendra Modi. It is hard to remember any state elections that have been so overshadowed by a bigger story. Local issues and local leaders have given way in these elections to two big national issues. These are the Prime Minister’s personal credibility and the credibility of that vision of India he painted in such luminous colours during the general election where voters gave him (not the BJP) the first full mandate that a prime minister has been given in 30 years.
It is the dream of a new kind of India that he has put before voters in his speeches in Maharashtra and Haryana. (Source: PTI photo)
I would like to repeat again in this column the reasons why I believe that the Lok Sabha election was not won by the BJP. Before Modi became its prime ministerial candidate, I am convinced that the BJP’s chances of winning more than 160 Lok Sabha seats were non-existent. This is because in the past decade it has been no more than a bad facsimile of the Congress. Like the Congress, the main concern of BJP leaders appeared to be to bring their progeny into politics. And under the sham of “serving the people”, they served mostly their own families. Modi changed the narrative by telling Indians that instead of dreaming of not just being poor, they should dream of a prosperous India in which every Indian could “hope to have a roof over his or her head by 2022”.
It is this dream of a new kind of India that he has put before voters in his speeches in Maharashtra and Haryana.
Sonia Gandhi knows this too. So the main point she has made in her speeches in Haryana and Maharashtra is that Modi made “false promises”. Where have prices come down, she demands, where is the black money he promised to bring back… “You were fooled by false promises”. And her son and heir echoes Mummy’s speeches and adds a personal touch by saying Modi represents “rich businessmen” while he represents “the poor”. In a funny kind of way, he is actually right. The Congress dream has always been only to “alleviate” poverty. Not to offer a release from it. So the investment that should have been made in the tools to remove poverty was never made: healthcare, sanitation, schools and rural infrastructure.