PDP accuses BJP of betrayal as miffed Mehbooba returns

As Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti flew back to Srinagar in a huff from New Delhi, after her meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi failed to take place, PDP leaders on Saturday accused the coalition partner, BJP, of “betrayal” and “backtracking.”

A senior PDP leader said Ms. Mufti seems upset at the BJP’s position “not to fast-track implementation of doable issues agreed to in the Agenda of the Alliance,” a common minimum programme of the two parties.Peoples Democratic Party president Mehbooba Mufti f Mufti was reportedly upset at the BJP’s position on the common minimum programme of the two parties.


Ms. Mufti, who stayed put all day in her ‘Fair View’ residence in Srinagar, preferred to be all by herself.

She met BJP president Amit Shah in New Delhi earlier this week and described it as “a positive meeting” to her party leaders. However, government formation hit a dead end on Saturday when Ms. Mufti took exception to the preposition of the BJP before her meeting with Mr. Modi. PDP sources revealed that the preposition made by the BJP was “completely unacceptable” to Ms. Mufti.

The real issue between PDP and BJP is just trust: Baig

Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leader Muzaffar Hussain Baig, MP, on Saturday said the PDP-BJP alliance was still not “beyond repair” and “Mehbooba Mufti should trust the Centre if there are public assurances from top government functionary”.

Speaking exclusively to The Hindu from New Delhi, Mr. Baig said, “There seems some miscommunication or misplaced perceptions, which has made the deadlock absolute right now.”

“I spoke to Ms. Mufti day before yesterday. The impression I got from Ms. Mehbooba was that she wants assurance from the competent governmental authority on certain items of the ‘Agenda of the Alliance’ be put on the fast track. She does not insist all should be done ahead of the government formation. If this position is conveyed to the BJP then the deadlock could be temporary,” said Mr.


On meeting being called off between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Ms. Mufti, Mr. Baig feigned ignorance. “If one goes by [BJP national general secretary] Ram Madhav’s statement, there is an opening. What he has implied is that Mehbooba ji is posing some new conditions. In other words she is demanding something outside the Agenda of the Alliance. I think that is the impression Mr. Madhav got after meeting Ms. Mehbooba but it is misplaced,” Mr. Baig said.

Among the founding members of the PDP, Mr. Baig sees plausible the Centre’s preposition that the ‘Agenda of the alliance’ is for the government to implement. “The logical step would be to form the government and raise the issues with the Central government and request expediting the same,” he said.

He sees the real issue between the PDP and the BJP “just trust”. “Relations are all about trust. Trust ho tou nikah namay ki zaroorat nahi padti, trust na ho tou nikah nama bhi kisis kaam nahi ata’ [If there is trust there is no need to have a Nikah paper, but if there is no trust no Nikah paper can help]. There seems mistrust and both the parties should sit down and settle that. They should not get entangled in trivial issues. The alliance will continue if there is trust on both sides, for that both the sides are equally responsible,” Mr. Baig told The Hindu.

Mr. Baigh sees positive signals from the BJP as “Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitely has categorically told to the PDP interlocutor that action will be taken on troop relocation. “Late Mufti Muhammad Sayeed never asked for troop relocation from strategic areas.”

The PDP leader said his advice would be that “there is already an agenda. The BJP said it is bound by it.

The position was reiterated by honourabe Union Finance Minister on the floor of Lok Sabha. She [Mehbooba] should trust the Central government because the continuation of the government is not only favourable for the PDP but also for the BJP. Why shouldn’t the BJP want to form the government and deliver on the promises?”

Posted by on March 20, 2016. Filed under State. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.