Stung by criticism, govt. swings into damage control mode

NEW DELHI(TH): Under fire from the Opposition and civil society for its handling of the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) incident, the government is making efforts to “retrieve” the situation now.

Top sources in the Home Ministry said that last week, just before the Parliament session was to commence, they had asked the Delhi Police for a report on the JNU row. They were also planning to send them another missive, asking why the police relied on video footage provided by a private news channel to register an FIR regarding the pro-Afzal Guru event organised there.

As reported by The Hindu earlier, though a police team was present when two groups of students were leading a march in JNU on February 9, an FIR of sedition was registered two days later when Zee News aired the show where some people allegedly raised anti-India slogans. As per the standard operating procedure (SOP), it is mandatory for the police to carry their own recording device whenever they have gone to attend a protest or gathering.

When contacted, Police Commissioner B.S. Bassi confirmed that they had sent a report to the MHA. He told The Hindu, “the video recording was only incidental, we have other evidence to prove the case.”

When asked why wasn’t the Delhi Police carrying their own camera and relied on the footage provided by Zee News, Mr. Bassi said, “the cameras Delhi Police have are amateurish. The video footage shot by you [news channels] people are done in a professional manner and they are of high quality. As I said earlier, video footage is only one of the evidence we have.”

Officials in the Home Ministry said they would do a “course-correction” on the JNU matter and would try to fix responsibility for “mishandling” the entire situation.

They added that the violence at Patiala House was completely avoidable and it unnecessarily embarrassed the government.

“The Delhi Police are doing their investigation but we will be asking them some tough questions on the way they mishandled the entire episode. We have asked them for a report on the entire episode and will be seeking further clarifications on the conduct of the policemen on the court premises,” said a senior Home Ministry official.

Mr. Bassi said they had sent a factual report to the MHA. He said, “It was a factual report and we have told the government that everything is fine at our end.”

He said the forensic report of the Zee News footage had not arrived yet. The police had sent the video footage for examination amid allegations that a doctored version was aired.

Vishwa Deepak, a news producer associated with the channel, had resigned as a mark of protest against the “biased coverage” of the incident.

In his resignation letter posted on his Facebook page, Mr. Deepak said, “A video which did not even have the slogan of ‘Pakistan zindabad’ was still aired continuously. How did we blindly believe that these voices which came in the dark were of Kanhaiya or his friends? Instead of ‘Bhartiya Court zindabad,’ they heard Pakistan zindabad and spoilt some people’s career, hopes and led their families to destruction.”

Under attack from the Opposition for mishandling both the Jawaharlal Nehru University and Hyderabad University crises, Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani delivered an aggressive response. Here’s what she said.

On Rohith Vemula expulsion

What Ms.Irani said: It was the Executive Council appointed by the UPA Government that expelled him.

Fact: The decision to expel him first was taken during the temporary tenure of Professor R.P.

Sharma in September 2015 and a proctoral board under him. This was revoked pending inquiry, following which an EC sub-committee was formed under Appa Rao Podile, an appointee of the BJP Government. It is the final decision of this committee that led to the expulsion of Rohith Vemula and four others from the hostel

As a counter to Ms, Mayawati who asked why there was no Dalit member on the panel to enquire into the expulsion, Ms. Irani said a Dalit member was co-opted

Fact: Prakash Babu was in the panel because he was Dean of student’s welfare and not because he was a Dalit. He quit his administrative responsibility following Rohith’s death and the subsequent press conference held by Ms. Irani.

On Rohith Vemula’s suicide

What Ms. Irani said: According to a report submitted to the Telangana High Court, the police reached Rohith’s hostel at 7:20 p.m. They found the room open and the body was on the table. No one allowed a doctor near this child, to revive this child. Instead, his body was used as a political tool.

Fact: Rohith was examined by a duty doctor of the University’s Health Centre, Dr Rajashree, at 7.20 p.m. and he was declared dead at 7.30 p.m. A requisition for post-mortem from the Gadchipoli police station to Osmania General hospital reiterates this.

Mahishasur celebrations in JNU

Irani brought up references to Mahishasur celebrations at the JNU in the context of documents submitted by the Registrar and how it was resisted by some students belonging to the SC/ST communities who also were beaten up for protesting.

Fact: Durga in some small traditions, notably Santhal tradition, is portrayed as someone who did seduce a local king. There are countless such small traditions that celebrate Mahishasur and Ravan too.

On February 25, when Ms Irani brought this up again, Congress MP Anand Sharma protested and questioned Ms. Irani’s attempts to draw in customs and traditions and Gods into a debate on JNU —leading to an adjournment.

Posted by on February 27, 2016. Filed under Nation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.